Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 A3D 281 - Montgomery County v. Iverson

Montgomery County v. Iverson’s Empirical Analysis

2012

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 2017
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Kaplin v. Lower Merion Township · Mollick v. Township of Worcester · Easton Area School District v. Baxter · Pennsylvania State Police v. Office of Open Records · Wilson v. ATLANTIC ICE DISTRIBUTORS

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The [r]equest provides no timeframe with regard to the emails it seeks. It does not identify specific individuals, email addresses, or even departments, but requests any applicable emails sent from the County’s domain to four other domains. There is no context within which the search may be narrowed. It is true that the Request limits the emails sought to those that have one of fourteen terms in the subject line; however, some of these search terms, such as “Trail,” are incredibly broad.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.