Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 A.3d 508

In re Allen

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · decided 2012-08-23

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently June 2019

12 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2012-08-23

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1ORDER

PER CURIAM.

¶2On consideration of the affidavit of Paul Shearman Allen, wherein he consents to disbarment from the Bar of the District of Columbia pursuant to § 12 of Rule XI of the Rules Governing the Bar of the District of Columbia Court of Appeals, which affidavit has been filed with the Clerk of this Court, and the report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility, it is this 23rd day of August 2012

¶3ORDERED that the said Paul Shear-man Allen is hereby disbarred by consent, effective October 1, 2012. The effective date of respondent’s disbarment shall run, for reinstatement purposes, from the date respondent files his affidavit pursuant to D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 14(g).

¶4The Clerk shall publish this order, but the affidavit shall not be publicly disclosed or otherwise made available except upon order of the Court or upon written consent of the respondent.

¶5The Clerk shall cause a copy of this order to be transmitted to the Chairman of the Board on Professional Responsibility and to the respondent, thereby giving him notice of the provisions of Rule XI, §§14 and 16, which set forth certain rights and responsibilities of disbarred attorneys and the effect of failure to comply therewith.

/50/a3d/508 · .json · Public domain