¶1dissenting. I dissent from the majority decision affirming the conviction in this case. I agree with appellant’s argument that it was error to allow the State’s expert witness to give testimony stating, in effect, that in her opinion it was the appellant who took the money that the books showed was missing. See Ethridge v. State, 9 Ark. App. 111, 654 S.W.2d 595 (1983).
50 Ark. App. 185
Hickson v. State
Decided July 5, 1995
Court of Appeals of Arkansas · decided 1995-07-05
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently January 2023
8 state decisions
Relies on Ethridge v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1995-07-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →