In Re Moore’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently May 2010
2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1322 · 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 524
Relies on Di Pierro v. Taddeo · Federal Land Bank v. Glenn · Winters National Bank & Trust Co. v. Coots (In Re Coots) · In Re Grimes · In Re Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The reaffirmation agreements are the controlling instruments and until such agreements have been performed, the original notes and mortgages are not reinstated”, (l.c. 302).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hotujac““A reaffirmation agreement is a voluntary and consensual act by the debtor and is a new promise by the debtor to pay a secured obligation”, (l.c. 302).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hotujac““Consequently, the reaffirmation agreement reinstates the terms of the promissory note and mortgage”, (l.c. 302).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Re Hotujac
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.