Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 BR 933 - In Re Edwards

In Re Edwards’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

47
cited by 47 later decisions
April 2009
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently April 2009 · most notably Zolg v. Kelly (1988), Green v. Staples (1991)

4 federal appellate · 1 district ·

250198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1325 · 11 U.S.C. § 727

Relies on Local Loan Co. v. Hunt · In the Matters of Lee Roy Murchison and John Whites · Withrow v. Larkin · Eisenstadt v. Baird · Everson v. Board of Education

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(b) After notice and a hearing, the court, on its own motion and not at the request or suggestion of any party in interest, may dismiss a case filed by an individual debtor under this chapter ... whose debts are primarily consumer debts if it finds that the granting of relief would be a substantial abuse of the provisions of this chapter ... There shall be a presumption in favor of granting the relief requested by the debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Although Code § 707(b) may have the effect of relegating a debtor to Chapter 13 if he wants any bankruptcy relief, any decision to utilize Chapter 13 remains that of the debtor.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “To make excessive or improper use of a thing, or to employ it in a manner contrary to the natural or legal rules for its use; to make an extravagant or excessive use, as to abuse one’s authority. Black’s Law Dictionary (1968).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.