Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Cal. 206

Hibbing v. Hyde

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875

California Supreme Court · decided 1875-07-01

The defendant recovered judgment in the court below, and the plaintiff appealed from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. The other facts are stated in the opinion.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently July 1900

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1875-07-01

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court, McKinstry, J.:

¶1The plaintiff alleges in his complaint that the defendant maliciously, and without probable cause, charged the plaintiff, before a justice of the peace, with having committed the crime of malicious mischief. Plaintiff also alleges that he was tried and found guilty of the crime charged; and this averment he succeeded in proving at the trial of the present action.

¶2In an action for malicious prosecution of a criminal charge, the plaintiff must prove that the prosecution, alleged to have been malicious, has terminated by his acquittal. (Rhodes v. Silvers, 1 Harr. 127; 2 Greenl. Evidence, 252; 1 Hill on Torts, 416; Hilliard, Remedies for Torts, 385.)

¶3Judgment and order affirmed.

/50/cal/206 · .json · Public domain