Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Cal. 612

Benjamin v. Eldridge

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1875

California Supreme Court · decided 1875-07-01

A corporation called the “Maxim Gas Company of California,” was formed to manufacture and sell illuminating gas. The gas was produced from gasoline. Livingston 0. Blair, while in the employ of the corporation, was killed by an explosion. The plaintiff was appointed administrator of his estate, and commenced this action on the twenty-sixth day of June, 1874, against the stockholders of the corporation to recover damages, alleging that the. acts of the corporation.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1875-07-01

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently January 1934

5 state decisions

201875188018901900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

By the Court:

¶11. The death of the plaintiff’s intestate occurred on the 28th day of December, 1871, while the statute of April 26, 1862, entitled “An Act requiring compensation for causing death by wrongful act, neglect, or default,” was in force— which statute required the action to be commenced, if at *613all, within two years after the death of such deceased person.” The action here was commenced on the 26th day of June, 1874—some two years and six months after the death.

¶22. The act of April 26,1862, was substantially re-enacted (Sec. 5, 0. 0. P.) by sections 376-77 of the Code of Civil Procedure of January, 1873, which Code was in force when the action was commenced, and the limitation therein prescribed was the same as that which had been prescribed by the act of April 26, 1862. (Code Civil Procedure, Sec. 339, subd. 4.) And the statute having commenced to run under the provisions of the act of 1862, continued to run, notwithstanding the taking effect of the Code of Civil Procedure (Sec. 9, 0. C. P.), and the cause of action was barred by the lapse of the period of two years after the death of the plaintiff’s intestate. The court below correctly sustained the demurrer to the complaint, and the judgment must be , affirmed.

¶3Judgment affirmed.

/50/cal/612 · .json · Public domain