Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 CALAPP2D 146 - People v. Cordero

People v. Cordero’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
April 1969
most recently cited

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently April 1969

4 federal appellate · 2 district · 6 state decisions

60194219501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Barbier v. Connolly · Kemmler · Morrison v. People of State of California · Miller v. Wilson · In Re Rameriz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Notwithstanding the fact that the Governments of the United States and the Philippines have amiably collaborated for the improvement of the economy, for the increase of liberty and for the upbuilding of the civilization of the islands, yet the Philippine Islands have never been incorporated into the United States. They constitute merely an insular possession appurtenant to the United States. By the Treaty of Paris in 1898, 30 Stat. 1754 the civil and political status of the Filipinos was to be determined by Congress. 42 Harvard Law Review, 809. No act of that body has ever conferred citizenship upon them. Ibid. The islands are a dependency until admitted into the union or until this government surrenders its jurisdiction over that territory.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.