50 Cal. App. 2d 152 - Smith v. Young’s Empirical Analysis
1942
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
August 1980
most recently cited
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Tupman v. Haberkern
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The issues upon which no findings were made were material and the mere finding that plaintiffs ‘were prevented’ from making their defense because they ‘believed’ that nothing further would be done is insufficient to support the judg ment ou the theory of fraud in that it does not establish fraud, extrinsic or otherwise, in the inducement of such belief.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rich v. Rich
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.