Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 CONNAPP 1 - State v. Otto

State v. Otto’s Empirical Analysis

1998

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
3
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently April 2018 · most notably State v. Morgan (2002), State v. Thomas (2018)

31 state decisions

150199820002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Benton v. Maryland · State v. Golding · Missouri v. Hunter · Garrett v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although a pending claim or civil suit by one of the witnesses might suggest evidence of bias or interest because the outcome of the criminal trial would bear directly on the success of the civil action, there was no such pending action here.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.