Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 CUSTCT 149 - Studner v. United States

Studner v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

1963

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
October 1969
most recently cited

Relationships

Relies on Latimer v. United States · Patton v. United States · Seeberger v. Castro · Schlesinger v. Beard · Midwest Waste Material Co. v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is the opinion of the court, in the instant case, that, as in the Pelton case, supra, the print rollers here in issue are “manufactured articles which have become useless for the original purpose for which they were made and fit only for remanufacture into something else” and, therefore, constitute waste in the tariff sense, as claimed by plaintiff.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.