Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 F.1d 128 - Whitcomb v. Emerson

Whitcomb v. Emerson’s Empirical Analysis

50 F. 128 · 1892

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
June 1962
most recently cited

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 1962

5 federal appellate · 2 district ·

4018921900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Harbinger v. Carver · McPhail v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““That the individual liability of a ship-owner shall be limited to the proportion of any or all debts and liabilities that his individual share of the vessel bears to the whole; and the aggregate liabilities of all the owners of a vessel on account of the same shall not exceed the, value of such vessels and freight pending.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.