No. 93-1767’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “if it would make a critical difference between establishing a violation and not doing so. Thus, if the absence of that evidence results in the dismissal or withdrawal of the charge, the subsequent discovery of that evidence will permit the resurrection of the charge.... 10 Id. at 445 . On review of the Board's second order, the court rejected this purported application of circuit law on the ground that the Board's explanation of the standard was internally inconsistent: the first sentence requires a”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, District Lodge 64, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board · International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

2. “no complaint shall issue based upon any unfair labor practice occurring more than six months prior to the filing of the charge with the Board.”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage
   e.g. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, District Lodge 64, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board · International Ass'n of Machinists & Aerospace Workers v. National Labor Relations Board

3. “absent special circumstances in which a respondent fraudulently conceals the operative facts underlying the alleged violation.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. International Association Of Machinists & Aerospace Workers, Afl-Cio, District Lodge 64, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board