Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 12

Docket No. 94-2910EM.

Small v. White

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: Mar. 17, 1995. Filed: Mar. 23, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-17

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Scarborough v. Morris

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-17

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before McMILLIAN, FAGG, and HANSEN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Darryl Small appeals the district court's denial of Small's 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 application. Having failed to file a timely postconviction motion in state court raising his ineffective assistance of counsel claims, Small contends the procedural default is excused by "his illiteracy, lack of education, pro se status, and diminished mental capacity." We disagree. Because the controlling law is clear, our review satisfies us that an opinion would have no precedential value. We thus affirm for the reasons given in the magistrate judge's report adopted by the district court. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

/50/f3d/12 · .json · Public domain