Choi v. Kim’s Empirical Analysis
50 F.3d 244 · 1995
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently August 2014
3 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1738
Relies on Nebraska v. Wyoming · Payless Wholesale Distributor, Inc. v. Albert Culver (P.R.) Inc. · Hullum v. United States · D. H. Overmyer Co., Inc. of Ohio v. Frick Co. · Crist v. Cline L R
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the rendering state 1) lacked personal jurisdiction over the judgment debtor, 2) lacked subject matter jurisdiction, [or] 3) failed to provide the judgment debtor adequate notice and an opportunity to be heard.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“elevates a Korean judgment to the status of a sister state judgment.”). While the existence of a Friendship Treaty is not dispositive, id. at 250 (holding, ultimately, that the Korean procedures executed pursuant to the Code of Civil Procedure did not comport with U.S. notions of due process) it certainly is a relevant consideration. 43 .DWMC was a substantial corporate citizen of Korea, employing thousands of people and involving numerous creditors. 44 . There is evidence that DMA harbored grave concerns about a”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.