Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 F.3d 381 - Houston v. Dutton

Houston v. Dutton’s Empirical Analysis

50 F.3d 381 · 1995

Citation profile

48
cited by 48 later decisions
2
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 48 later decisions — most recently April 2013 · most notably Coe v. Bell (1998), State v. Ryan (1996)

31 federal appellate · 1 district · 3 state decisions

230199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Chapman v. State of California · Kotteakos v. United States · Brecht v. Abrahamson · Estelle v. McGuire

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 48 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) The victim was under 12 and the defendant over 18; (2) The murder was especially heinous, atrocious, or cruel and involved torture; (3) The murder was committed for the purpose of avoiding prosecution; and (4) The murder was committed while the defendant was engaged in committing and fleeing after committing aggravated rape and aggravated kidnapping.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “Tennessee is a 'weighing' state--that is, the jury determines whether any aggravating circumstances have been established beyond a reasonable doubt by the State and then balances this against any mitigating circumstances found by the individual jurors. If the jury unanimously finds that the aggravators outweigh the mitigators, death must be imposed.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “If a deadly weapon is handled in a manner so as to make the killing a natural or probable result of such conduct, then that may be considered by you as to the existence of malice sufficient to support a conviction of murder in the second degree unless it is rebutted by other facts and circumstances.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.