Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 5

Docket No. 94-7442.

Cox v. Hunt

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 19, 1995 Decided: February 22, 1995

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Babin v. Yale Materials Handling Corp.

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-02-22

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Warren H. Cox, Bernard Reid McKinnon, Frederick W. Corbett, Appellants Pro Se.

James Peeler Smith, Assistant Attorney General, M. Lynn Jarvis, NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Raleigh, North Carolina; William C. Scott, BROOKS, PIERCE, McLENDON, HUMPHREY & LEONARD, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cox v. Hunt, No. CA-93-363-5-BO (E.D.N.C. Nov. 8, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/50/f3d/5 · .json · Public domain