Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 6

Docket No. 94-7228.

John Wesley Johnson v. George M. Hinkle Henry L. Campbell

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided Mar. 16, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-16

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently March 1995 · most notably Kendall v. R a Young W C (1995), Lloyd v. Jenkins (1995)

32 federal appellate ·

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Truong Dinh Hung v. United States · Evans v. Croom

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-16

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry C. Morgan, Jr., District Judge. (CA-94-641)

John Wesley Johnson, appellant pro se.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals the district court's order dismissing his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. The district court assessed a filing fee in accordance with Evans v. Croom, 650 F.2d 521 (4th Cir.1981), cert. denied, 454 U.S. 1153 (1982), and dismissed the case without prejudice when Appellant failed to comply with the fee order. Finding no abuse of discretion, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/50/f3d/6 · .json · Public domain