Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 7

Docket No. 94-7240.

Docket No. 94-7242

Maloney v. Kight W

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: January 19, 1995 Decided: February 17, 1995

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-02-17

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Charles Peacock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-02-17

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Timothy Kevin Maloney, Appellant Pro Se.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Maloney v. Kight, No. CA-94-2626-AW (D. Md. Oct. 12, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

/50/f3d/7 · .json · Public domain