Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 7

Docket No. 94-7245.

Sherman Earl Robinson v. Edward W. Murray

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Feb. 16, 1995. Decided March 16, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-03-16

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Charles Peacock v. Wal-Mart Stores, Incorporated

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-03-16

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, District Judge. (CA-94-326-AM)

Sherman Earl Robinson, appellant pro se. Katherine P. Baldwin, Office of the Atty. Gen. of Virginia, Richmond, VA, for appellee.

Before HAMILTON and MOTZ, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Robinson v. Murray, No. CA-94-326-AM (E.D. Va. Sept. 29, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

/50/f3d/7 · .json · Public domain