Dawson v. Scott’s Empirical Analysis
50 F.3d 884 · 1995
Citation profile
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 71 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2021 · most notably Reno v. Koray (1995), Miller v. Gammie (2003)
29 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3142 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3146 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3148 (Bail Reform Act of 1984) · 18 U.S.C. § 3585 · 18 U.S.C. § 4001 · 18 U.S.C. § 751 · 21 U.S.C. § 841 (§ 401 of the Controlled Substances Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · City of Cleburne Texas v. Cleburne Living Center · United States v. Bass · United States v. Wilson · Hensley v. Municipal Court, San Jose-Milpitas Judicial Dist., Santa Clara Cty.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 71 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arbitrary, capricious, or manifestly contrary to the statute.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“'two-step process' " of review has been established. Dawson, 50 F.3d at 886 (quoting Jaramillo v. I.N.S., 1 F.3d 1149 , 1152 (11th Cir.1993) (en banc)). 13 First, if congressional purpose is clear, then interpreting courts and administrative agencies "must give effect to the unambiguously expressed intent of Congress.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e have joined other circuits that have determined that custody or official detention time is not credited toward a sentence until the convict is imprisoned, and that release stipulations or imposed conditions that do not subject a person to full physical incarceration do not qualify as official detention.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.