Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 F.3d 9

Docket No. 94-7352.

Utsey v. Roof

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Jan. 19, 1995. Decided Feb. 21, 1995.

Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-02-21

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on United States v. Dawn Dempsey Sutton, A/K/A M & M, A/K/A Denny

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-02-21

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Barry Utsey, Appellant Pro Se. John Gregg McMaster, Jr., TOMPKINS & MCMASTER, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

¶1

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.* Utsey v. Roof No. CA-93-2600-3-2BC (D.S.C. Oct. 3, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

*

In light of this disposition, Utsey's motion for appointment of counsel is hereby denied

/50/f3d/9 · .json · Public domain