Weiner v. Winters’s Empirical Analysis
1970
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently March 2017
1 federal appellate · 3 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 77A (§ 1 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 78A (§ 1 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934)
Relies on United States v. Radio Television News Directors Ass'n · Pittsburgh Ry Co v. United States · Klebanow v. New York Produce Exchange · General Time Corp. v. Talley Industries, Inc. · Abramson v. Pennwood Investment Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“derivative action may not be maintained if it appears that the plaintiff does not fairly and adequately represent the interests of the shareholders ... similarly situated in enforcing the right of the corporation ...,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lewis v. Chiles
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.