Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

2 federal appellate · 2 district ·

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “id., and presumably a genuine issue as to the retaliatory intent that may be inferred from such knowledge. 41 This court agrees that Ms. Bausman has alleged a retaliatory discharge claim sufficient to raise a triable issue of fact as to her prima facie case, particularly when all reasonable inferences are drawn in her favor as the non-moving party. That being so, the burden would thus shift to IBC to refute the prima facie case by offering a legitimate non-retaliatory motive for the discharge. 42 For purposes of summary judgment, the district court concluded that”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

2. “(Id. at 242.) At some point, Bausman gave IBC a Family and Medical Leave Act physician's certification form completed, signed and dated by Dr. Bernard on May 5, 1994. The certification states that Dr. Bernard saw Bausman on May 4, 1994, diagnosed her condition as”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

3. “told him that I had called the doctor and talked to him about being sick quite a bit, due to the medication for my arm, and that would take about two weeks to get it healed. I told this to Todd, and he said, 'Fine, you will need a doctor's slip.'”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.