Fromer v. Yogel’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1367
Relies on Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co. · Ernst & Ernst v. Hochfelder · Montgomery Ward & Co. v. Duncan · Ultramares Corp. v. Touche · Glanzer v. . Shepard
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A claim for contribution under the federal securities laws ... requires a third-party plaintiff to allege all the elements of the offensef,] ... namely that the Third-Party Defendants either knowingly or recklessly] made material misrepresentations to the [injured parties] on which [these parties] relied in the purchase of the [securities] and which proximately caused loss to [the parties].”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Whereas contribution involves claims among joint tortfeasors, indemnification may arise when one party claims not to be a tortfeasor. This party, having jointly settled claims with others who are the tortfeasors, now seeks reimbursement from those actually culpable”) (emphasis added); Degener v. Hall Contracting Corp., -S.W.3d-,-, 2000 WL 652428 at (Ky. 2000) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“of the jurisdiction with the greatest interest in the substantive legal claim at hand.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.