Randolph v. Hendry’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently February 2019
3 federal appellate · 2 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1446 · 28 U.S.C. § 1448
Relies on Volkswagenwerk Aktiengesellschaft v. Schlunk · Allendale Leasing, Inc. v. Stone · Bankston v. Toyota Motor Corp. · Koehler v. Dodwell · 589 F. Supp. 1182 - Chrysler Corp. v. General Motors Corp.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“defendant who makes the decision to remove the case to federal court restarts the clock.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“"Provided the State of destination does not object, the present Convention shall not interfere with [¶] (a) the freedom to send judicial documents, by postal channels, directly to persons abroad, [¶] (b) the freedom of judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of origin to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination, [¶] (c) the freedom of any person interested in a judicial proceeding to effect service of judicial documents directly through the judicial officers, officials or other competent persons of the State of destination." (Hague Service Convention, supra, 20 U.S.T. 361, Art. 10.)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[N]o single provision in the Hague [Service] Convention has received as much judicial attention as Article 10(a).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.