E. E. Black, Ltd. v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 2003
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Fehlhaber Corporation v. United States · Peter Kiewit Sons' Co. v. United States · 75 F. Supp. 1018 - Chernus v. United States · H. L. Yoh Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[E]stimates made in invitations for bids for contracts which are to be paid for on a unit price basis are only estimates and not guaranteed amounts. But it certainly does not mean that [a provision providing for] a modification of the contract to conform to unforeseen subsurface or latent conditions, "or unknown conditions of an unusual nature, differing materially from those ordinarily encountered" is to be canceled out of the contract. Neither does it mean that all considerations of equity and justice are to be disregarded, and that a contract to do a useful job for the Government is to be turned into a gambling transaction.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“provision. This court has already determined that a unit price provision does not abrogate a separate provision relating to unforeseen circumstances or conditions. [E]stimates made in invitations for bids for contracts which are to be paid for on a unit price basis are only estimates and not guaranteed amounts. But it certainly does not mean that [a provision providing for] a modification of the contract to conform to unforeseen subsurface or latent conditions,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.