50 Ill. 2d 136 - People v. Taylor’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

111

cited by 111 later decisions

states following

May 2025

most recently cited

109 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 111 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 62 Ill. 2d 448 - People v. McDonald (1975), 217 Ill. 2d 348 - People v. Christopher K. (2005)

109 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 40 Ill. 2d 62 - People Ex Rel. Stamos v. Jones · 35 Ill. 2d 80 - People Ex Rel. MacMillian v. Napoli · 36 Ill. 2d 369 - The PEOPLE v. Quintana · 124 Ill. App. 2d 268 - People v. Taylor · 34 Ill. 2d 305 - People v. Lerch

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 111 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““At that time, section 114 — 12(b) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (111. Rev. Stat. 1963, ch. 38, par. 114 — 12(b)) provided that if a pretrial motion to suppress evidence is granted, the evidence suppressed under such order shall not be admissible in evidence against the movant at any trial." (Emphasis added.) (Taylor, 50 Ill. 2d at 138 , 277 N.E.2d at 879-80 .)”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 17 Ill. App. 3d 285 - People v. Williams · 245 Ill. App. 3d 703 - People v. McGee
““Accordingly that portion of Section 109 — 3(e) of the Code of Criminal Procedure which declares that the State may not appeal from the interlocutory orders referred to therein is void.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 133 Ill. 2d 163 - Kirwan v. Welch · 3 Ill. App. 3d 280 - People v. Marotta
““» * * arresting judgment because of a defective indictment, information or complaint; quashing an arrest or search warrant; or suppressing evidence.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 3 Ill. App. 3d 280 - People v. Marotta · 387 Ill. App. 3d 446 - People v. LEEZER

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.