Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Ill. App. 149

White v. White

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 18, 1893

Appellate Court of Illinois · decided 1893-03-18

Memorandum.—Suit for separate maintenance. Appeal from an order for temporary alimony entered by the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, A. D. 1892, and affirmed.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1920

1 state decisions

Relies on Harding v. Harding · Farwell v. Huling · Huling v. Farwell

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1893-03-18

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Opinion of the Court,

Gary, P. J.

¶2This is an appeal from an order for temporary alimony, on a bill for separate maintenance.

¶3The only complaint is as to the amount, and as that was awarded upon a master’s report to which no objections were made below, the amount can not be questioned here. Huling v. Farwell, 33 Ill. App. 238, which, though reversed by the Supreme Court, (Farwell v. Huling, 132 Ill. 112,) was there affirmed on this point. If the appellee has a home well furnished, she may still claim temporary alimony. She is not required to exhaust her own resources first. The authority of Harding v. Harding, 40 Ill. App. 202, is destroyed by a reversal of that judgment of this court in 144 Ill. 588.

¶4The order is affirmed.

/50/illapp/149 · .json · Public domain