Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 Ill. App. 3d 69 - Cooper v. Meyer

50 Ill. App. 3d 69 - Cooper v. Meyer’s Empirical Analysis

1977

Citation profile

29
cited by 29 later decisions
4
states following
February 1999
most recently cited

26 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently February 1999 · most notably 133 Ill. App. 3d 184 - Duncan v. Rzonca (1985), POPPLE BY POPPLE v. Rose (1998)

26 state decisions

170197719801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 56 Ill. 2d 22 - Barnes v. Washington · City of Elmhurst v. Kegerreis · 116 Cal. App. 2d 310 - Ellis v. D'Angelo · White v. Seitz · Byron v. Byron

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““A parent is under a duty to exercise reasonable care so as to control his minor child as to prevent it from intentionally harming others or from so conducting itself as to create an unreasonable risk of bodily harm to them, if the parent (a) knows or has reason to know that he has the ability to control his child, and (b) knows or should know of the necessity and opportunity for exercising such control.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““In the present case, there is no pleading which indicated that the defendant had any knowledge that the plaintiff would visit. There is no assertion that the defendant had any prior knowledge of the possibility of a visit by the plaintiff. We also note that the defendant was not at home and thus, had no opportunity to directly control the conduct of the minor child at the time of the tort. Further, the pleadings do not state that the defendant had knowledge that there had been opportunity to so control the minor child.” 50 Ill. App. 3d 69, 72 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.