Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Ind. 22

Werneke v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1875

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1875-05-15

<p>Liquor Law.—Information.—In ah information, under the liquor law of 1873, for selling intoxicating liquor to a person in the hahit of getting intoxicated, it was not necessary to allege that the defendant had notice of such habit.</p>

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1908

2 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1875-05-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

"Worden, J.

¶1Information against the appellant for selling intoxicating liquor to a person (naming him) who was then and there in the habit of getting intoxicated. Conviction. The point made by the appellant is, that the information should have alleged that the appellant had notice that the person to whom the liquor was sold was in the habit of getting intoxicated. We are of opinion that such allegation was unnecessary.

¶2The judgment below is affirmed, with costs.

/50/ind/22 · .json · Public domain