Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Kan. App. 2d 468

State v. Dickey

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided June 27, 2014

Court of Appeals of Kansas · decided 2014-06-27

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2020

17 state decisions

Relies on State v. Murdock

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 2014-06-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PlERRON, J.,

¶1concurring: I agree with the majority that the crime in question must be classified as a nonperson felony. However, I believe we need only cite to State v. Murdock, 299 Kan. 312, 319, 323 P.3d 846 (2014), where the court, after explaining the need to find the two prior out-of-state convictions must be scored as nonperson felonies states: “We recognize this rule results in the classification of all pre-1993 crimes as nonperson felonies — an outcome the State characterizes as unreasonable. But the solution to the State’s complaint sits with the legislature.”

/50/kanapp2d/468 · .json · Public domain