Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 LAANN 847 - State v. Cancienne

State v. Cancienne’s Empirical Analysis

1898

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
September 2011
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently September 2011

16 state decisions

501898190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is possible that appellant had no good substantial ground for believing his life to have been in danger at that time and through his wife’s conduct, but that was a matter for the jury to determine.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.