¶1delivered the opinion of the court.
¶2The plaintiff seeks to compel defendant to cancel and surrender a mortgage upon premises purchased, as he claims, under the following circumstances; One Cyrus Williams owned the land, and had given the defendant a mortgage to secure the purchase-money, which was not recorded. Desirous of selling it to the plaintiff, they went to defendant, who verbally agreed to surrender the mortgage for other security, and told the plaintiff to go on and purchase, as Williams and he had made ah arrangement* or come to an understanding, in relation to the mortgage debt, and he would bring .him the papers to be destroyed. The plaintiff then purchased the land, paying principally in other land, and *476entered and made improvements ; but defendant failed to surrender the mortgage, and is seeking to enforce it.
¶3An examination of the record relieves us of the necessity of passing upon the legal questions discussed by counsel, as there is not sufficient evidence to warrant an interference. A verbal agreement of this kind should be established beyond reasonable doubt. Nothing should be left to conjecture, and little to probabilities. The testimony of the plaintiff and of those who support him is flatly contradicted by defendant and others, who show that the agreement to surrender was conditional upon being furnished with other security equally good, and that no such security was offered. ... •.
¶4Judgment affirmed.