Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 N.C. 399

McCracken v. . McCrary

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1858

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1858-06-05

This was an action of COVENANT, tried before Saundebs, J., at the last Spring Term of Alamance Superior Court. The action was brought on the following instrument: “ Thomas McCracken: “ You will please to let the bearer, Mr. Thomas G. Brown, have the note made by him, and General Joseph S. Ilolt, security, and we, the undersigned, will be responsible to you for the same on this order.

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1845

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1858-06-05

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Pearson, J.

¶1 There being no evidence that the bond was in the possession, or within the control of the defendants, the notice to produce it amounted to nothing. The fact, that the bond was delivered to Brown, and that he had left the State, tended to show that he had it in his possession ; if so, the fact of its being out of the State, did not make parol evidence of its contents admissible; Threadgill v. White, 11 Ire. Rep. 591; Davidson v. Norment, 5 Ire. Rep. 555 ; 1 Greenleaf, 113. The calculation made by the witness, was based on the contents of the bond and the endorsed credits, consequently, it was secondary evidence, and was inadmissible, in the absence of proof that the bond was lost or destroyed.

¶2 There is error, venire de novo.

¶3 Pee Cueiah, Judgment reversed.

/50/nc/399 · .json · Public domain