Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 N.M. 121 - Wilson v. Sewell

Wilson v. Sewell’s Empirical Analysis

1946

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
2
states following
July 1995
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently July 1995

2 federal appellate · 13 state decisions

70194619501960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Engler · 54 Cal. App. 439 - People v. Casanova · Meagher v. Reeney · Talbott v. Treacy · Plant v. Thompson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Appellant claims that it was incumbent upon appellee to allege and prove that the purchaser procured by him ,was ready, able, and willing to pay for the property. It is true that in cases where the agent had produced a purchaser to whom the owner refused to sell, in order for him to recover, it iis uniformly held that he must allege and show that the purchaser so tendered by the agent was ready, able, and willing to consummate the purchase at the price named.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““This case presents no circumstances which would vary the general and quite universal rule that the broker has earned, and is entitled to, his commission, under the character of agreement here relied upon, when he has procured a purchaser who either consummates the purchase, or who is ready, able and willing to do so upon the terms given to the agent by the owner.” (quoting Williams v. Engler, 46 N.M. 454, 457 , 131 P.2d 267, 269 (1942) (emphasis added).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.