¶1 reads for affirmance. All concur.
¶2 Andrews and Sapallo, JJ., upon the ground that plaintiff was in possession and defendant had shown no title.
¶3 Order affirmed, and judgment absolute againt defendant.
50 N.Y. 694
Wallace v. . Fee
Decided December 24, 1872
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1872-12-24
The parties were seized each of a portion of lot twenty-nine in the city of Rochester, deriving title from a common source; by that the… Held: 1st. That the original title, and the right of possession of the parties, as derived therefrom, extended no further west than the east line of Clyde street, as it then was. 2d. That the language of the description in plaintiff’s deed carried his right to the center of the street; and when the public abandoned its easement plaintiff…
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1872-12-24
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently March 1904
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
View the full empirical analysis of this case →