¶1 reads opinion for reversal and new trial.
¶2 Eolger, Rapadlo and Andrews, JJ., concur upon the first ground discussed.
¶3 Peckham, J., reads opinion for affirmance. Church, Ch. J., and Grover, J., concur.
¶4 Judgment reversed.
50 N.Y. 696
Decided December 24, 1872
New York Court of Appeals · decided 1872-12-24
The action was brought against defendant, as a surgeon, for malpractice, in treating a dislocated elbow joint. Held: error (Church, Ch. J., Peckham and Grover, JJ., dissenting); various other questions were discussed in the prevailing opinion, but were not agreed to by a majority of the court.
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1872-12-24
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently April 1974
1 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.