← 50 Ohio App. 3d 4 - Goldstein v. Goldstein

50 Ohio App. 3d 4 - Goldstein v. Goldstein’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

cited by 13 later decisions

states following

August 1996

most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Sorin v. Board of Education · State ex rel. Crockett v. Robinson · 6 Ohio St. 3d 55 - State ex rel. Kabatek v. Stackhouse · State ex rel. Grosser v. Boy · 46 Ohio App. 2d 97 - Standard Oil Co. v. Grice

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““In the final analysis, notwithstanding appellees’ contention that the trial court retained jurisdiction to make the awards it made of costs and fees, the appellant’s case ceased to exist at the moment she filed her notice of voluntary dismissal and the trial court was divested of jurisdiction in the matter. * * * ” See, also, Clay Hyder Trucking Lines v. Riley (1984), 16 Ohio App.3d 224, 225 , 16 OBR 240, 241, 475 N.E.2d 183, 184 (after dismissal, “no action remained pending before the court * * *.”); Torres v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. (1980), 68 Ohio App.2d 87, 91 , 22 O.O.3d 99, 101 , 427 N.E.2d 32, 35 (“Once appellants filed their notice of dismissal, no action remained pending before the court * * *.”).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 81 Ohio App. 3d 284 - Ewing v. Summit Pathology Associates, Inc.
“(BXU Subject to divisions (BX2) and (3), (C), and (D) of this section, at any time prior to the commencement of the trial in a civil action or within twenty-one days after the entry of judgment in a civil action, the court may award reasonable attorney's fees to any party to that action adversely affected by frivolous conduct. The award may be assessed as provided in division (BX4) of this section. It***”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Sturm v. Sturm
“has been characterized as 'absolute' despite recognition that it '*** may be subject to abuse.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. Sturm v. Sturm

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.