Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Ohio St. 2d 5

State v. Jones

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1977

Ohio Supreme Court · decided 1977-04-13

Decided 1977-04-13

Per Curiam.

¶1The Motion for Delayed Appeal filed by the defendant, pro se, in the Court of Appeals was unnecessary as the defendant was properly before that court on his original notice of appeal. “Failure of an appellant to take any step other than the timely filing of a notice of appeal does not affect the validity of the appeal .” App. R. 3(A). The filing of the record and briefs necessary to prosecute the appeal herein was not completed. But, this laxity could well be ascribed to causes over which the defendant had no control and for which he should not be penalized.

¶2It is clear that the defendant must be given an opportunity to have the merits of his cause reviewed by an appellate court.

¶3The judgment of the Court of Appeals' is reversed, and the cause is remanded to that court for a hearing on the merits. ’ •

¶4Judgment reversed.

0 ’Neill, C. J., HeRbebt, Celebbezze, W. Brown, P. Bbown, Sweeney and Locher, JJ., concur.
/50/ohiost2d/5 · .json · Public domain