Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

50 Or. App. 181

State v. La Roda

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 26, 1981

Court of Appeals of Oregon · decided 1981-01-26

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1984

2 state decisions

Applies OR 135 § 135.050

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1981-01-26

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM

¶1 Defendant urges that the trial court abused its discretion in accepting his plea of guilty, because, he says, the record demonstrates that the plea was not voluntarily entered. The contention is not within the scope of review on direct appeal from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to a guilty plea. ORS 135.050. If the trial court committed error, it was constitutional error and the remedy lies in a post-conviction proceeding. See generally, State v. Jairl, 229 Or 533, 541-42, 368 P2d 323 (1962); State v. Slopak, 3 Or App 532, 475 P2d 421 (1970).

¶2Affirmed.

/50/orapp/181 · .json · Public domain