Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 SO3D 1041 - Ragland v. State

Ragland v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 895 So. 2d 836 - Bush v. State · 430 So. 2d 832 - Read v. State · 666 So. 2d 767 - Cole v. State · Leatherwood v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the record affirmatively shows ineffectiveness of constitutional dimensions, or (2) the parties stipulate that the record is adequate to allow the appellate court to make the finding without consideration of the findings of fact of the trial judge.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “we are limited to the trial court record in our review of the claim and there is usually insufficient evidence within the record to evaluate the claim.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “to deny relief, preserving the defendant's right to argue the same issue through a petition for post-conviction relief.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.