In Re Richard’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 459 So. 2d 520 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Whittington · 513 So. 2d 1173 - Louisiana State Bar Ass'n v. Reis · 633 So. 2d 150 - In Re Pardue · In Re Banks · Britton & Koontz First National Bank v. Smith
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“li>[T]he record reflects that [Richard] forged a medical record at the request of a client whom he represented on drug charges. Based on [Richard]’s own testimony, it appears he suspected his client intended to take the forged record to buy drugs. Moreover, [Richard] was convicted of criminal mischief stemming from a violent physical altercation with his elderly father. This conduct violated Rules 8.4(b) and 8.4(c) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.