Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 SO3D 25 - Fuller v. Truncale

Fuller v. Truncale’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

12 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mireles v. Waco · Pulliam v. Allen · Castillo v. G · Tucker v. Resha · Berry v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Jjudicial immunity is intended to prevent a judicial party from becoming involved in a lawsuit, it would be compromised, and irreparable harm sustained, simply by forcing a judicial party to become involved in litigation, irrespective of its outcome. The harm would be irreparable because if the parties wait to address the issue of judicial immunity until appeal, any protection the immunity affords against suit would be sacrificed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “[The clerk] lacked the power to suspend the licenses of those in the class, his recommendation was one step in 'that process. Without his recommendation, license suspension — which is obviously a discretionary judicial act — would not have occurred. Therefore, [the clerk:] was engaging in a judicial act, not a ministerial one, when he recommended license suspension without scheduling a hearing.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.