De Guerin v. Jackson’s Empirical Analysis
1932
Citation profile
3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
November 2009
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Collum v. Sanger Bros. · Ramirez v. Smith · Bounds v. Little · De Las Fuentes v. McDonald · Blankenship v. Douglas
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“: the authorities agree that pos-posin order to constitute notice, must be actual possession of the party, or his agent or tenant, consisting of acts of occupancy which are open, vis-visand unequivocal, and in nature suf-sufupon the observation of a subse-subsepurchaser to put him on inquiry as to the rights of the possessor. Blankenship v. Douglas, 26 Tex. 225 , 82 Am.Dec. 608; Ramirez v. Smith, 94 Tex. 184 , 59 S.W. 258 ; Aurelius v. Stewart (Tex.Civ.App.) 219 S.W. 863 ; Evans v. Foster, 79 Tex. 48 , 15 S.W. 170 ; 2 Pomeroy Eq. Jur. (4 Ed.) § 620; 46 C.J. § 38, p. 547. It must not be ■equivocal or casual. Murphy v. Welder, 58 Tex. 235 ; Fuentes v. McDonald, 85 Tex. 132 , 20 S.W. 43 ; Vineyard v. Brundrett, 17 Tex.Civ.App. 147 , 42 S.W. 232 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.