Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 SW3D 23 - Nasr v. Rubio

Nasr v. Rubio’s Empirical Analysis

2001

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
May 2008
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Applies 9 U.S.C. § 2

Relies on Southland Corp. v. Keating · Allied-Bruce Terminix Cos., Inc. v. Dobson · Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. Tipps · Prudential Securities Inc. v. Marshall · EZ Pawn Corp. v. Mancias

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The type of "prejudice" the courts seem to focus on is when a party uses the judicial process to gain access to information that would not have been discoverable in arbitration. The rule here is that "when only a minimal amount of discovery has been conducted, which may also be useful for the purpose of arbitration, the court should not ordinarily infer waiver based upon prejudice."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the courts seem to focus on is when a party uses the judicial process to gain access to information that would not have been discoverable in arbitration. The rule here is that”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “We should resolve any doubts about waiver in favor of arbitration.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.