Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 TC 164 - Fischer v. Commissioner

Fischer v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

115
cited by 115 later decisions
February 2010
most recently cited

6 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 115 later decisions — most recently February 2010 · most notably Crocker v. Commissioner (1989), Electric & Neon, Inc. v. Commissioner (1971)

6 federal appellate ·

500196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Welch v. Helvering · Deputy v. du Pont · Higgins v. Commissioner · Kornhauser v. United States · Arizona v. California

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 115 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The cases, the rulings, and the regulations make clear that whether a service for which an expenditure is made constitutes medical care will depend upon its therapeutic nature to the individual, and not upon the title of the person rendering the service,5 or whether the expense is “medical” to all persons,6 or the general nature of the institution in which the service is rendered.7 [Footnotes omitted.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “....... (e) Definitions. — Eor purposes of this section— (1) the term “medical care” means amounts paid— (A) for the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, or for the purpose of affecting any structure or function of the body (including amounts paid for accident or health insurance) * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “Deductions for * * * medical care allowable under section 213 will be confined strictly to expenses incurred primarily for the prevention or alleviation of a physical or mental defect. * * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.