50 Wash. App. 405 - State v. Brown’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 871 (Presidential Threat Protection Act of 2000)
Relies on Chaplinsky v. State of New Hampshire · New York v. Ferber · Gooding v. Wilson · Watts v. United States · 101 Wash. 2d 259 - State v. MacIolek
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It shall be unlawful for any person to threaten to bomb or otherwise injure any public or private school building, any place of worship or public assembly, any governmental property, or any other building, common carrier, or structure, or any place used for human occupancy; or to communicate or repeat any information concerning such a threatened bombing or injury, knowing such information to be false and with intent to alarm the person or persons to whom the information is communicated or repeated.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“an indication of something impending and . . . : a: an expression of an intention to inflict evil, injury, or damage on another . . . as retribution or punishment for something done or left undone . . . .” It is implicit in the term”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“when the challenge asserts that the statute under which the defendant is charged is in its entirety unconstitutionally vague on its face, the challenger has standing”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Bahl
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.