Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 50 Wash. App. 888 - State v. Vinyard

50 Wash. App. 888 - State v. Vinyard’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

39
cited by 39 later decisions
4
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. JP (2003), State v. J.P. (2003)

39 state decisions

2001988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 489 - State v. Eilts · 36 Wash. App. 428 - State v. Mark · 38 Wash. App. 135 - State v. Hartwell · 47 Wash. App. 114 - State v. Goodrich · 43 Wash. App. 793 - State v. Forbes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[R]estitution ordered by a court pursuant to a criminal conviction shall be based on easily ascertainable damages for injury to or loss of property, actual expenses incurred for treatment for injury to persons, and lost wages resulting from injury.... The amount of restitution shall not exceed double the amount of the offender’s gain or the victim’s loss from the commission of the crime.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[R]estitution is authorized only by statute, and a trial court exceeds its statutory authority in ordering restitution where the loss suffered is not causally related to the offense committed by the defendant, or where the statutory provisions are not followed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “in locating or returning the child, or causally related to the actual crime of custodial interference.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.