United States v. Haley’s Empirical Analysis
500 F.2d 302 · 1974
Citation profile
37 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently June 2018 · most notably United States v. Perez (2002), United States v. Cordero (1981)
37 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Bass · Illinois Power Co. v. Local Union No. 51, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers · Huddleston v. United States · Kahm v. United States · In re Disbarment of Allison
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We think that the government’s evidence in this case, which established possession of the firearm, was circumstantial evidence which would allow the jury to reasonably infer receipt.” 500 F.2d at 304 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[t]he government has the burden of proving that the criminal activity took place in the district where the prosecution [was] undertaken”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“Venue is a fact which must be proved at the trial.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.